App rejected: privacy policy URL missing or not working

Guideline 5.1.1 covers data collection and storage, and the most common way to fall foul of it is the simplest: the URL you entered does not load for

Updated · Written from the same rules terms.gg uses to generate documents

What the rejection means

Guideline 5.1.1 covers data collection and storage, and the most common way to fall foul of it is the simplest: the URL you entered does not load for the reviewer.

The usual causes

What to change

Put the policy somewhere that will still exist in a year, open the URL in a private window before you submit, and check it again on every update.

Before you resubmit

Keeping it true after launch

A legal page stops being true the moment the product moves past it, usually by adding a payment provider, an analytics SDK or a sign-in. No store re-checks your pages against your build, so the drift is yours to notice.

Common questions

How long does a resubmission take?

Usually the same as a first review. Answering the exact point raised, with a link, is what shortens it.

Can I argue a rejection?

You can, and sometimes you should. It works when the reviewer has misread something and you can show it in one sentence with a link. It rarely works as a general objection.